You are here

Canadian Politics

Strategic Voting, Tactical Packing, Dreaming of Golf

Live from the Chapters Starbucks in beautiful, sunny Ancaster Ontario, it's The Bradcast Election Day post. I drove by Hamilton Golf and Country Club today (yeah that one; one of the 10 best in North America) and I swear it looked green enough to play. This has been one weird winter. Jan tells me it's 11 degC in Calgary today. So much for the weather terror of the winter election; it never happened. As I pack up the last of the major items in the house in advance of the moving guys, I'm glad the timing allowed me a chance to vote one last time in Ontario. Back in Alberta, about 60% of the population will be voting Conservative and the map will be solid blue. My vote is needed here in Ancaster as this is a much tighter district. The polls are very busy today. Very busy. Busier than 2004 when I was a polling scrutineer. Stuff is happening, things are changing and brilliant sun has me thinking more about that golf course than of politics... I'm planning to be back here in early September to catch the Canadian Open. If you are a golf junky and have never made the trek to the Ancaster Links -- one of the unofficial names for HG&CC -- then check your calendar and come see our hallowed ground. This course will have you crying tears of joy at the wonder of it all and, no doubt, it will certainly be a source of tears for many great golfers. So tonight in the boxed up house it's more packing and stacking. And then a late visit -- polls close at 9:30 PM -- to my father's house to watch the election results. My prediction? The sun will rise tomorrow and we will all be one day older. PS: The comment fields are closed today due to Canada's arcane election rules. If you want to post election results you won't be doing it here.

Politics and Economics: 
Miscellaneous Thoughts: 

USA Today Gets it Right

Regarding the Jan 23 Election; USA Today nails it:
"Ethics, not ideology, has been the central issue."

On Monday we find out how much is enough.

Politics and Economics: 

Back in the land of Tomorrow.

We're back in Calgary and off the foggy roads. Well, at least until the furniture arrives... Next month.

And let me just say that while I love Chicago, the State of Illinois Department of Highway Robbery is quite another matter. The rebuilding of I94/80? Oh yeah that's going really well. And thanks for making it even harder for out-of-state folks to pay for your tollways. Beauty. Illinois is managed kinda' like Canada. One party, for far too long.

Which leads me to my opener of the new blogging year; the Great Canadian Election of Winter 2006. People are starting to stir to the fact that they may elect a Conservative government but I'm going to doubt right here that it will be a majority. I am indeed filled with wonder and respect yet again for the people of Quebec. Not only have they moved the Conservatives from 8% to 20% in the Quebec polls; but also, they are definitely on to something in the likes of Gilles Duceppe.

Duceppe, destroyed the last vestige of Paul Minister Prime Martin's credibility over 2 nights of debate earlier this week. Duceppe is no master of the English language but, like Chretien, he is much better than he lets on. Drawing Martin into recognizing the "Nation" of Quebec on Monday was a great moment in Canadian politic debate. For me, the best I've heard since Mulroney's famous "You had a choice, Sir!" outburst in the '80's.

Harper's, 'aw shucks, I'm not a charismatic spin-doctor' routine was just what the spin doctor ordered. Now the race is his to lose.

Liberals had it all with Jean Chretien. They had the House, the Senate, the Privy Council. They built on the legacy of their enemy Mulroney - who began the process of great national transformation - and they let the economy throb to life. They had the trust of a majority of Canadians and they were embued with a heritage of entitlement that was firmly rooted in the legacy of the Trudeau and Pearson years.

Over the past 3 years -- for no good reason -- the Party has rusted and wrenched itself apart. We are witnessing no less than all out civil war in this election as Liberals fight Liberals for the crumbs of the legacy.

Into the breach steps an untested Conservative party. An amalgam of reformers, populists and progressives. The next stage of national greatness will once again be initiated by a Conservative government. Will Harper be a Mulroney or a Clark? A Macdonald or a Meighen? Will we define ourselves by the visions of a leader or the narrowness of a man?

Business and Marketing: 
Miscellaneous Thoughts: 
Politics and Economics: 

Debate?

Listening to the first English language Canadian election debate (listening, not watching -- I'm sick of the media focus on whether so-and-so blinked at the right time) I must say as an informed voter that I am insulted and appalled by the format that the party leaders have been compelled to follow.

There is no interaction, very little emotion and practically no depth. At one point, a question from a low income individual in Ontario about the GST was discussed with the earnestness of a bunch of first year political science students. Nobody -- not one of the leaders -- would honestly address the question and point out that low income citizens receive GST rebate checks on a regular basis. Low income Canadians get their GST money back! Why was this question even allowed in the rotation?

The format for follow-up comments -- steered by the moderator -- does not provide enough time for a reasonable answer. Eager sound engineers turned off the politicians' microphones mid-sentence thus making a mockery of their statements. It's completely disrespectful. The future of democracy? Hurry up! National unity? Beat the clock. Health care and social programs? There's no time! No time!

This format is dreadful and does no one any good. While voters have many reasons to be disrespectful of Federal politicians, this so-called debate format does a tremendous disservice to each of the party leaders.

(Follow-up: Gilles Duceppe -- the separatist -- called Canada a great nation at least twice; you've gotta' love the civility of our perennial national unity angst.)

Politics and Economics: 

Hares and Rabbits

I'm back from my self-administered cone of silence. And look what's happened while I was away; another Election!

You will notice that this site has removed it's articles from the last campaign. This time around I think I'll just point to other sites that will give a prospective voter some good background. My initial hunch is that the campaign will be very low key until the week after the New Year. A smart strategist may introduce some key discussion points for family and party conversation in mid-December, but I wouldn't expect the real scrapping to begin until after the Holidays. There is a possibility that the Liberals will have to go very negative in this campaign in order to hang on to what they have.

Best candidate-on-the-go site that I have seen to this point is Garth Turner's The Turner Report. It's fact filled, the comments look real and the response is pragmatic. Garth is a savvy journalist and a former cabinet minister. Experience and frankness in the quantities he delivers bode well for the team that could be forming the next government.

Technology: 
Politics and Economics: 

Well that got cleared up...

The new GG is in the clear; glad to have her aboard.

Despite all the assurances that the GG selection process is filled with "rigourous", "stringent" and "exhaustive" background checks, I wonder. If that were the case, then the political hacks, loyal civil servants and Privy Council mandarins involved in the process would have been deftly able to handle this goofy little tempest. Instead, it's been a week of goal tending finally put to rest by a press release from the lady herself. Not to mention that she is at least as qualified as the past couple of GG's. What self-respecting separatist is going to dawn a hat to ride in a carriage with Her Majesty?

Politics and Economics: 

Locked-Out by a Separatist Curler

Look; if you are not Canadian, then move on and read the next post. Move along. Nothing to see here.

Now... I wanted to write about how CBC radio sounds like a 1967 FM easy listening radio station during the lock-out. And I thought about writing on what could be a curling armageddon (I was okay with a winter without hockey -- I'm done with hockey -- but a winter without curling is barbaric and devoid of humanity.). But I went over to the Canadian political blog of record and found that 'the Warren' is having second thoughts about our new GG. Look, I didn't have a clue who the new GG-designate was when she was named ; owing to the fact that I don't watch CBC TV. And face it, those of you who read this blog will no doubt know how ignorant I am... but Bourque is certainly digging. Is this just a summer scandal or is there anything real here?

Politics and Economics: 

The Rorschach Minister

"I don't believe that Canadians are as psychologically prepared for a terrorist attack as probably we all should be."
Anne McLellan, Deputy Prime Minister and Public Security Minister for Canada, speaking to reporters after addressing a disaster management conference, Monday July 11, 2005

Ah, the dulcet monotony of Liberal certitude, how sweet the sound of Anne McLellan. (Who's qualification to be a "Public Security" Minister is what exactly?)

Well, Dr. Anne, how big a terrorism hit are we going to take? Help me out here so that I can prepare psychologically. The patent goofiness of this absurd and chilling statement by a Crown Minister, somebody who should be spending every waking night thinking of a way to protect our way of life rather than bulldoze through security and defense budgets, is this:

In the summer of 2001 I lost my mother to a massive stroke after she had spent the previous 6 years slipping away with Alzheimer's. How psychologically prepared was I for that? Not as much as I thought. Unless you waste away with worry and incapacitate yourself with dooms-day scenarios, you can't possibly be "psychologically prepared" for terrorism and how sane would that be in any event? McClellan dishonours the victims of terrorism and appears to wash her hands of responsibility. Unfathomable and unforgiveable.

Next election I'm spending some time in Edmonton to help unseat a national disaster and an embarrassment.

Politics and Economics: 

Stronach

Liberals in Canada have never been averse to hardball, power-play politics. They routinely accept all manner of political personalities from other parties. In fact, they sometimes elect leaders from this group of political opportunists. Liberals call this "big tent" politics. It is opportunistic, short-sighted, cynical, unprincipled, disdainful... and it works. Liberals rule Canada with wreckless abandon and are nearly unchallenged in their ability to govern at will. In the past week they ignored an instruction from Parliament to resign. Belinda Stronach voted against the ruling elite of the Liberal Party at that time. She has voted repeatedly to defeat the Liberals.

Today she changed her mind.

With Stronach's appalling deceit comes the realization that no matter how despicable we think politics is -- especially at the Federal level in Canada -- it can become even more disgraceful, destructive and corrupt. The lesson to learn from this is that no matter how it affects your personal reputation, it's always better to put power, avarice, bitterness and self-interest ahead of compassion, honour, loyalty, principles, belief, religion, love and truth. None of this will stick to Stronach. She's the girl-child goddess of Canada. Her speaking style is monotonous and her vision unfettered by passion, but she will maintain her Martha-smooth teflon exterior. The media will hound Stephen Harper. They will ask what mean things he might have said to her. They will posit that she was driven out.

Okay. So here's my proposition. If you are a jaded cynic, a hard-core non-voter, a devoted agnostic, an unengaged apathetic why not vote Conservative next time just to see if they in fact will lie less than the current crop of Monsters-in-Law. I guarantee that they will lie far less. Every donut and a half at Tim Horton's now realizes that we were lied to far less by (...even?) Brian Mulroney in 8 years than this crew has done in the last 8 months; not to mention the past 12 years or so.

Politics and Economics: 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Canadian Politics